Crypfo.info has created a suite of its own frameworks for establishing the fundamentals of a crypto project. In deriving the proper models and frameworks, universal foundational laws were applied (in no specific order):
— A projects 3 fundamental scores are evaluated and established against itself. Projects grades by no means are dependant on one another; if two very technologically similar projects score very differently from one another no slack is given to the lower scorer.
— A project’s final grades are rated against themselves and the standard of the greater crypto ecosystem.
— Every grade is subjected to and influenced by its own Industry, Purpose, and Archetype.
— Privacy centric projects are likely to lack sensitive public information, henceforth their models are weighted differently.
— The Community & Value Proposition scores directly impact the outcome of a projects final score, whereas the Governance merely acts as an amplifier to the grade.
— Low grades in one of 3 fundamentals do not necessitate a low final score, however, a low final score necessitates low fundamental scores.
The frameworks are applied in 4 generalized segments: