Before a Crypto-asset/project can be evaluated and scored, it must first be Identified in terms of its Archetype. Once Identified, the proper evaluation model can be applied and an accurate fundamental project State can be deduced.
By their very nature cryptoassets vary wildly, and while it would be convenient to apply one formula to qualitatively assess all digital assets, it would be bias and incomplete.
To put things in perspective, we cannot and do not apply the same framework for evaluating Corn as we do for evaluating Gold.
For this, Crypfo utilizes a proprietary framework, dubbed “AIM – Asset Identity Matrix“ for the segmentation of cryptoassets across the generalizations within the industry.